• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:

    公开号:NL2005997A
    申请号:NL2005997
    申请日:2011-01-13
    公开日:2011-08-22
    发明作者:Alexandre Viktorovych Padiy；Boris Menchtchikov
    申请人:Asml Netherlands Bv；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    LITHOGRAPHIC APPRATUS AND DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHOD
    FIELD
    The present invention relates to methods and apparatus usable, for example, in the manufacture of devices by lithographic techniques.
    BACKGROUND
    A lithographic apparatus is a machine that applies a desired pattern onto a substrate, usually onto a target portion of the substrate. A lithographic apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In that instance, a patterning device, which is alternatively referred to as a mask or a reticle, may be used to generate a circuit pattern to be formed on an individual layer of the 1C. This pattern can be transferred onto a target portion (e.g. comprising part of, one, or several dies) on a substrate (e.g. a silicon wafer). Transfer of the pattern is typically via imaging onto a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist) provided on the substrate. In general, a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are successively patterned. Known lithographic apparatus include so-called steppers, in which each target portion is irradiated by exposing an entire pattern onto the target portion at one time, and so-called scanners, in which each target portion is irradiated by scanning the pattern through a radiation beam in a given direction (the “seanning”-direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction. It is also possible to transfer the pattern from the patterning device to the substrate by imprinting the pattern onto the substrate.
    In order to monitor the lithographic process, parameters of the patterned substrate are measured. Parameters may include, for example, the overlay error between successive layers formed in or on the patterned substrate and critical linewidth of developed photosensitive resist. This measurement may be performed on a product substrate and/or on a dedicated metrology target. There are various techniques for making measurements of the microscopic structures formed in lithographic processes, including the use of scanning electron microscopes and various specialized tools. A fast and non-invasive form of specialized inspection tool is a scatterometer in which a beam of radiation is directed onto a target on the surface of the substrate and properties of the scattered or reflected beam are measured. By comparing the properties of the beam before and after it has been reflected or scattered by the substrate, the properties of the substrate can be determined. This can be done, for example, by comparing the reflected beam with data stored in a library of known measurements associated with known substrate properties. Two main types of scatterometer are known. Spectroscopic scatterometers direct a broadband radiation beam onto the substrate and measure the spectrum (intensity as a function of wavelength) of the radiation scattered into a particular narrow angular range. Angularly resolved scatterometers use a monochromatic radiation beam and measure the intensity of the scattered radiation as a function of angle.
    In order to better control scanner functionality, a module has been recently devised which automatically drives the system towards a pre-defined baseline each day (or so). This scanner stability module retrieves standard measurements taken from a monitor wafer using a metrology tool. The monitor wafer had been previously exposed using a special reticle containing special scatterometry marks. Using the monitor wafer and that day’s measurements (and possibly historical measurement data from previous days), the scanner stability module determines how far the system has drifted from its baseline, and then calculates wafer-level overlay and focus correction sets. The baseline can be defined either directly by the reference layer on the monitor wafers (in this case, the scanner stability module will drive the system towards minimal overlay on the baseliner monitor wafers) or indirectly by a combination of the reference layer on the wafers and a target overlay fingerprint (in this case, the scanner stability module will drive the system towards the defined target overlay fingerprint on the monitor wafers). The lithography system then converts these correction sets into specific corrections for each exposure on subsequent production wafers.
    The alignment model sequences used provide a significant noise source for the scanner stability module controller attempting to control the scanner using overlay data from the very limited number of monitor wafers (typically from 4 to 12 wafers per week per scanner).
    SUMMARY
    It is desirable to provide a system whereby the scanner stability module control accuracy is improved while still using the same or similar limited number of monitor wafers as present.
    According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic apparatus comprising: a support constructed to support a patterning device; a substrate table constructed to hold a substrate; a patterning system configured to transfer a pattern from said patterning device onto a target portion of the substrate, positioning apparatus operable to position said substrate table, said patterning system and said patterning device relative to each other in a patterning pass comprising a sequence of movements such that said pattern is applied repeatedly at a plurality of target portions of the substrate, and a control module operable to aid control of at least one of said support, substrate table or patterning system by periodically retrieving measurements defining baseline control parameters from one or more reference substrates so as to determine parameter drift from said baseline control parameters thereby enabling allowance and/or correction to be made for said drift, said reference substrate(s) having initially undergone patterning so as to determine said baseline control parameters; wherein said apparatus is operable during said initial patterning of said at least one reference substrate, to perform multiple patterning passes on at least one of said one or more reference substrates.
    According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of producing at least one reference substrate for a lithographic apparatus, said reference substrate being usable in combination with a control module which periodically retrieves measurements from said least one reference substrate which define baseline control parameters, so as to aid scanning control during a lithographic process by determining parameter drift from said baseline control parameters, thereby enabling allowance and/or correction to be made for said drift, said baseline control parameters being determined by initially patterning said at least one reference substrate using said lithographic apparatus, said method comprising performing multiple patterning passes on at least one of said one or more reference substrates, said multiple patterning passes comprising applying a pattern repeatedly at a plurality of target portions of the reference substrate.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
    Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts, and in which:
    Figure 1 depicts a lithographic apparatus;
    Figure 2 depicts a lithographic cell or cluster;
    Figure 3 depicts a first scatterometer;
    Figure 4 depicts a second scatterometer;
    Figure 5 illustrates the control loops in a lithographic process utilising a scanner stability module.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
    Figure 1 schematically depicts a lithographic apparatus. The apparatus comprises: an illumination system (illuminator) IL configured to condition a radiation beam B (e.g. UV radiation or DUV radiation).
    a support structure (e.g. a mask table) MT constructed to support a patterning device (e.g. a mask) MA and connected to a first positioner PM configured to accurately position the patterning device in accordance with certain parameters; a substrate table (e.g. a wafer table) WT constructed to hold a substrate (e.g. a resist-coated wafer) W and connected to a second positioner PW configured to accurately position the substrate in accordance with certain parameters; and a projection system (e.g. a refractive projection lens system) PL configured to project a pattern imparted to the radiation beam B by patterning device MAonto a target portion C (e.g. comprising one or more dies) of the substrate W.
    The illumination system may include various types of optical components, such as refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic, electrostatic or other types of optical components, or any combination thereof, for directing, shaping, or controlling radiation.
    The support structure supports, i.e. bears the weight of, the patterning device. It holds the patterning device in a manner that depends on the orientation of the patterning device, the design of the lithographic apparatus, and other conditions, such as for example whether or not the patterning device is held in a vacuum environment. The support structure can use mechanical, vacuum, electrostatic or other clamping techniques to hold the patterning device. The support structure may be a frame or a table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required. The support structure may ensure that the patterning device is at a desired position, for example with respect to the projection system. Any use of the terms “reticle” or “mask” herein may be considered synonymous with the more general term “patterning device.”
    The term “patterning device” used herein should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to impart a radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section such as to create a pattern in a target portion of the substrate. It should be noted that the pattern imparted to the radiation beam may not exactly correspond to the desired pattern in the target portion of the substrate, for example if the pattern includes phase-shifting features or so called assist features. Generally, the pattern imparted to the radiation beam will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit.
    The patterning device may be transmissive or reflective. Examples of patterning devices include masks, programmable mirror arrays, and programmable LCD panels. Masks are well known in lithography, and include mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types. An example of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of small mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted so as to reflect an incoming radiation beam in different directions. The tilted mirrors impart a pattern in a radiation beam, which is reflected by the mirror matrix.
    The term “projection system” used herein should be broadly interpreted as encompassing any type of projection system, including refractive, reflective, catadioptric, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical systems, or any combination thereof, as appropriate for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors such as the use of an immersion liquid or the use of a vacuum. Any use of the term “projection lens” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general term “projection system”.
    As here depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. employing a transmissive mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may be of a reflective type (e.g. employing a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above, or employing a reflective mask).
    The lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more mask tables). In such “multiple stage” machines the additional tables may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables while one or more other tables are being used for exposure. For example, in one such machine, one table may be used for measurement and alignment (the measure side), while another table may simultaneously be used for exposure (the exposure side).
    The lithographic apparatus may also be of a type wherein at least a portion of the substrate may be covered by a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water, so as to fill a space between the projection system and the substrate. An immersion liquid may also be applied to other spaces in the lithographic apparatus, for example, between the mask and the projection system. Immersion techniques are well known in the art for increasing the numerical aperture of projection systems. The term “immersion” as used herein does not mean that a structure, such as a substrate, must be submerged in liquid, but rather only means that liquid is located between the projection system and the substrate during exposure.
    Referring to Figure 1, the illuminator IL receives a radiation beam from a radiation source SO. The source and the lithographic apparatus may be separate entities, for example when the source is an excimer laser. In such cases, the source is not considered to form part of the lithographic apparatus and the radiation beam is passed from the source SO to the illuminator IL with the aid of a beam delivery system BD comprising, for example, suitable directing mirrors and/or a beam expander. In other cases the source may be an integral part of the lithographic apparatus, for example when the source is a mercury lamp. The source SO and the illuminator IL, together with the beam delivery system BD if required, may be referred to as a radiation system.
    The illuminator IL may comprise an adjuster AD for adjusting the angular intensity distribution of the radiation beam. Generally, at least the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outerand σ-inner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in a pupil plane of the illuminator can be adjusted. In addition, the illuminator IL may comprise various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. The illuminator may be used to condition the radiation beam, to have a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.
    The radiation beam B is incident on the patterning device (e.g., mask MA), which is held on the support structure (e.g., mask table MT), and is patterned by the patterning device. Having traversed the mask MA, the radiation beam B passes through the projection system PL, which focuses the beam onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioner PW and position sensor IF (e.g. an interferometric device, linear encoder, 2-D encoder or capacitive sensor), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the radiation beam B. Similarly, the first positioner PM and another position sensor (which is not explicitly depicted in Figure 1) can be used to accurately position the mask MA with respect to the path of the radiation beam B, e.g. after mechanical retrieval from a mask library, or during a scan. In general, movement of the mask table MT may be realized with the aid of a long-stroke module (coarse positioning) and a short-stroke module (fine positioning), which form part of the first positioner PM. Similarly, movement of the substrate table WT may be realized using a long-stroke module and a short-stroke module, which form part of the second positioner PW. In the case of a stepper (as opposed to a scanner) the mask table MT may be connected to a short-stroke actuator only, or may be fixed. Mask MA and substrate W may be aligned using mask alignment marks M1, M2 and substrate alignment marks P1, P2. Although the substrate alignment marks as illustrated occupy dedicated target portions, they may be located in spaces between target portions (these are known as scribe-lane alignment marks). Similarly, in situations in which more than one die is provided on the mask MA, the mask alignment marks may be located between the dies.
    The depicted apparatus could be used in at least one of the following modes: 1. In step mode, the mask table MT and the substrate table WT are kept essentially stationary, while an entire pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C at one time (i.e. a single static exposure). The substrate table WT is then shifted in the X and/or Y direction so that a different target portion C can be exposed. In step mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the size of the target portion C imaged in a single static exposure.
    2. In scan mode, the mask table MT and the substrate table WT are scanned synchronously while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C (i.e. a single dynamic exposure). The velocity and direction of the substrate table WT relative to the mask table MT may be determined by the (de-)magnification and image reversal characteristics of the projection system PL. In scan mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the width (in the non-scanning direction) of the target portion in a single dynamic exposure, whereas the length of the scanning motion determines the height (in the scanning direction) of the target portion.
    3. In another mode, the mask table MT is kept essentially stationary holding a programmable patterning device, and the substrate table WT is moved or scanned while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C. In this mode, generally a pulsed radiation source is employed and the programmable patterning device is updated as required after each movement of the substrate table WT or in between successive radiation pulses during a scan.
    This mode of operation can be readily applied to maskless lithography that utilizes programmable patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.
    Combinations and/or variations on the above described modes of use or entirely different modes of use may also be employed.
    As shown in Figure 2, the lithographic apparatus LA forms part of a lithographic cell LC, also sometimes referred to a lithocell or cluster, which also includes apparatus to perform pre- and postexposure processes on a substrate. Conventionally these include spin coaters SC to deposit resist layers, developers DE to develop exposed resist, chill plates CH and bake plates BK. A substrate handler, or robot, RO picks up substrates from input/output ports 1/01,1/02, moves them between the different process apparatus and delivers then to the loading bay LB of the lithographic apparatus.
    These devices, which are often collectively referred to as the track, are under the control of a track control unit TCU which is itself controlled by the supervisory control system SCS, which also controls the lithographic apparatus via lithography control unit LACU. Thus, the different apparatus can be operated to maximize throughput and processing efficiency.
    In order that the substrates that are exposed by the lithographic apparatus are exposed correctly and consistently, it is desirable to inspect exposed substrates to measure properties such as overlay errors between subsequent layers, line thicknesses, critical dimensions (CD), etc. If errors are detected, adjustments may be made to exposures of subsequent substrates, especially if the inspection can be done soon and fast enough that other substrates of the same batch are still to be exposed.
    Also, already exposed substrates may be stripped and reworked - to improve yield - or discarded, thereby avoiding performing exposures on substrates that are known to be faulty. In a case where only some target portions of a substrate are faulty, further exposures can be performed only on those target portions which are good.
    An inspection apparatus is used to determine the properties of the substrates, and in particular, how the properties of different substrates or different layers of the same substrate vary from layer to layer. The inspection apparatus may be integrated into the lithographic apparatus LA or the lithocell LC or may be a stand-alone device. To enable most rapid measurements, it is desirable that the inspection apparatus measure properties in the exposed resist layer immediately after the exposure. However, the latent image in the resist has a very low contrast - there is only a very small difference in refractive index between the parts of the resist which have been exposed to radiation and those which have not - and not all inspection apparatus have sufficient sensitivity to make useful measurements of the latent image. Therefore measurements may be taken after the post-exposure bake step (PEB) which is customarily the first step carried out on exposed substrates and increases the contrast between exposed and unexposed parts of the resist. At this stage, the image in the resist may be referred to as semi-latent. It is also possible to make measurements of the developed resist image - at which point either the exposed or unexposed parts of the resist have been removed - or after a pattern transfer step such as etching. The latter possibility limits the possibilities for rework of faulty substrates but may still provide useful information.
    Figure 3 depicts a scatterometer which may be used in the present invention. It comprises a broadband (white light) radiation projector 2 which projects radiation onto a substrate W. The reflected radiation is passed to a spectrometer detector 4, which measures a spectrum 10 (intensity as a function of wavelength) of the specular reflected radiation. From this data, the structure or profile giving rise to the detected spectrum may be reconstructed by processing unit PU, e.g. by Rigorous Coupled Wave Analysis and non-linear regression or by comparison with a library of simulated spectra as shown at the bottom of Figure 3. In general, for the reconstruction the general form of the structure is known and some parameters are assumed from knowledge of the process by which the structure was made, leaving only a few parameters of the structure to be determined from the scatterometry data. Such a scatterometer may be configured as a normal-incidence scatterometer or an oblique-incidence scatterometer.
    Another scatterometer that may be used with the present invention is shown in Figure 4. In this device, the radiation emitted by radiation source 2 is collimated using lens system 12 and transmitted through interference filter 13 and polarizer 17, reflected by partially reflected surface 16 and is focused onto substrate W via a microscope objective lens 15, which has a high numerical aperture (NA), preferably at least 0.9 and more preferably at least 0.95. Immersion scatterometers may even have lenses with numerical apertures over 1. The reflected radiation then transmits through partially reflecting surface 16 into a detector 18 in order to have the scatter spectrum detected. The detector may be located in the back-projected pupil plane 11, which is at the focal length of the lens system 15, however the pupil plane may instead be re-imaged with auxiliary optics (not shown) onto the detector. The pupil plane is the plane in which the radial position of radiation defines the angle of incidence and the angular position defines azimuth angle of the radiation. The detector is preferably a two-dimensional detector so that a two-dimensional angular scatter spectrum of a substrate target 30 can be measured. The detector 18 may be, for example, an array of CCD or CMOS sensors, and may use an integration time of, for example, 40 milliseconds per frame.
    A reference beam is often used for example to measure the intensity of the incident radiation. To do this, when the radiation beam is incident on the beam splitter 16 part of it is transmitted through the beam splitter as a reference beam towards a reference mirror 14. The reference beam is then projected onto a different part of the same detector 18 or alternatively on to a different detector (not shown).
    A set of interference filters 13 is available to select a wavelength of interest in the range of, say, 405 - 790 nm or even lower, such as 200 - 300 nm. The interference filter may be tunable rather than comprising a set of different filters. A grating could be used instead of interference filters.
    The detector 18 may measure the intensity of scattered light at a single wavelength (or narrow wavelength range), the intensity separately at multiple wavelengths or integrated over a wavelength range. Furthermore, the detector may separately measure the intensity of transverse magnetic- and transverse electric-polarized light and/or the phase difference between the transverse magnetic- and transverse electric-polarized light.
    Using a broadband light source (i.e. one with a wide range of light frequencies or wavelengths - and therefore of colors) is possible, which gives a large etendue, allowing the mixing of multiple wavelengths. The plurality of wavelengths in the broadband preferably each has a bandwidth of Δλ and a spacing of at least 2 Δλ (i.e. twice the bandwidth). Several “sources” of radiation can be different portions of an extended radiation source which have been split using fiber bundles. In this way, angle resolved scatter spectra can be measured at multiple wavelengths in parallel. A 3-D spectrum (wavelength and two different angles) can be measured, which contains more information than a 2-D spectrum. This allows more information to be measured which increases metrology process robustness. This is described in more detail in EP1 628164 A.
    The target 30 on substrate W may be a 1-D grating, which is printed such that after development, the bars are formed of solid resist lines. The target 30 may be a 2-D grating, which is printed such that after development, the grating is formed of solid resist pillars or vias in the resist. The bars, pillars or vias may alternatively be etched into the substrate. This pattern is sensitive to chromatic aberrations in the lithographic projection apparatus, particularly the projection system PL, and illumination symmetry and the presence of such aberrations will manifest themselves in a variation in the printed grating. Accordingly, the scatterometry data of the printed gratings is used to reconstruct the gratings. The parameters of the 1-D grating, such as line widths and shapes, or parameters of the 2-D grating, such as pillar or via widths or lengths or shapes, may be input to the reconstruction process, performed by processing unit PU, from knowledge of the printing step and/or other scatterometry processes.
    A key component of accurate lithography is an increased ability to control lithography scanners and scanning functionality (When referring to “scanners” it should be appreciated that this encompasses all the scan modes and functionality described herein, and other scanning functionalities). Improvements to the scanner’s focus and overlay (layer-to-layer alignment) uniformity have recently been achieved by the applicant’s Baseliner ™ scanner stability module, leading to an optimized process window for a given feature size and chip application, enabling the continuation the creation of smaller, more advanced chips.
    When a lithography system is first installed, it must be calibrated to ensure optimal operation. However, over time, system performance parameters will drift. A small amount of drift can be tolerated, but too much drift and the system will go out of specification. Consequently manufacturers are required to stop production periodically for re-calibration. Calibrating the system more frequently gives a bigger process window, but at the cost of more scheduled downtime.
    The scanner stability module greatly reduces these production stoppages. Instead, it automatically drives the system towards a pre-defined baseline on a regular basis (typically every few days). To do this, it retrieves standard measurements taken from one or more monitor wafers using a metrology tool. The monitor wafer is exposed using a special reticle containing special scatterometry marks. From that day’s measurements, the scanner stability module determines how far the system has drifted from its baseline. It then calculates wafer-level overlay and focus correction sets. The lithography system then converts these correction sets into specific corrections for each exposure on subsequent production wafers.
    For volume production, it is desirable to have full flexibility when assigning layers for exposure to a scanner. The alternative, layer-scanner dedication, would put monthly output capacity at risk, since any small disturbance of the lithocluster would directly show up in the output of that month. One known approach to overcome this risk is by so called (overlay) grid matching. All scanner grids are intentionally offset a little, such that all scanners more or less have the same (average) grid for overlay. This grid is often referred to as ‘holy’ or ‘golden’ grid. Each product layer can now be exposed on each scanner of the same type. This ‘golden’ grid is exposed and etched onto so called ‘reference wafers’. If these ‘golden’ matching wafers are used as the baseline for overlay stability control instead of random monitoring wafers, overlay grid matching and long-term stability can be achieved in a single automated step.
    Figure 5 depicts the overall lithography and metrology method incorporating the scanner stability module 500 (essentially an application running on a server, in this example). Shown are three main process control loops. The first loop provides the local scanner control using the scanner stability module 500 and monitor wafers. The monitor wafer 505 is shown being passed from the main lithography unit 510, having been exposed to set the baseline parameters for focus and overlay. At a later tine, metrology unit 515 reads these baseline parameters, which are then interpreted by the scanner stability module 500 so as to calculate correction routines so as to provide scanner feedback 550, which is passed to the main lithography unit 510, and used when performing further exposures.
    The second (APC) loop is for local scanner control on-product (determining focus, dose, and overlay). The exposed product wafer 520 is passed to metrology unit 515 where information relating to the critical dimensions, sidewall angles and overlay is determined and passed onto the Advanced Process Control (APC) module 525. This data is also passed to the scanner stability module 500. Process corrections are made before the Manufacturing Execution System (MES) 535 takes over, providing scanner control to the main lithography unit 510, in communication with the scanner stability module 500.
    The third loop is to allow metrology integration into the second APC loop (e.g. for double patterning). The post etched wafer 530 is passed to metrology unit 515 which again passes information relating to the critical dimensions, sidewall angles and overlay, read from the wafer, to the Advanced Process Control (APC) module. The loop continues the same as with the second loop.
    Currently the scanner stability module product definition assumes that scanner stability module monitor wafers are exposed in lot operations using scanner settings that are similar to the settings used for exposing customer product wafers. In particular, this means that the exposure layout of the scanner stability module monitor wafers is similar to the exposure layout of the typical customer product, with no special processing or routines applied.
    However, in test software for certain lithography systems (e.g. Twinscan RTM) dedicated exposure sequences are used for some of the setup tests in order to achieve desired setup accuracy while using only a limited number of wafers for exposure. For example, multi-meander exposures are used in final XY (FXY) testing that calibrate systematic linear offsets (the so-called blue alignment offsets: BAOs) between the actual in-resist overlay and the overlay expected based on the alignment model (Stage Align/Wafer Align/Reticle Align/Lot Correction-SA/WA/RA/LoCo). The wafer alignment model determines how alignment results are used to determine the position, rotation and magnification of each exposure.
    FXY testing is a calibration test which primarily aims to correct for alignment offset (difference) between wafer and reticle alignment. During this test each wafer, after having been loaded and aligned on the measure-side (assuming a multi-stage lithographic machine) proceeds to the exposure side of the machine, whereupon a plurality of exposure meanders are performed, in combination with modulating the light intensity per exposure such that every field gets exposed only once. Following this, the wafer moves back to measure side for unloading. As this calibration test cannot distinguish between an offset resultant from inconsistency between wafer and reticle alignment and an offset resultant from alignment errors, alignment noise suppression techniques are implemented in this calibration test.
    In the FXY test, each exposure meander is preceded by its own reticle align (RA) test. Therefore the impact of RA reproduction is averaged out, since the RA reproduction is effectively reduced by a factor of 2.5 (for the case of 6-pass exposure). To explain this statistical estimation, assume alignment noise to be 1. The average of 6 alignments would then give noise of 1/sqrt(6) which is approximately 2.5 times smaller than 1. It should be noted that the number of meanders does not need to be 6 and could be any arbitrary value above 1, depending on the application. Therefore fewer wafers need to be used in FXY testing for achieving the specified BAO calibration accuracy: 18 wafers would normally be needed when using standard single-pass exposures, to achieve the intra-field BAOs accuracy that is achieved by FXY testing on only 3 wafers via the use of 6-pass exposures.
    Another way of achieving multi-pass exposure functionality is by means of special tricks like “virtual load/unload”. In this case, a wafer is first loaded and aligned at the measure side. It is then moved it to the exposure side for a first exposure, after which it is returned to the measure side, in the unload position. However, instead of being unloaded, it is simply left in the unload position for a specified period of time, then moved to load position where the process is repeated. This process can be repeated multiple times thus allowing the mimicing the exposing of multiple wafers onto a single wafer.
    At the moment the multi-pass exposure functionality is accessible only through the use of dedicated test software. However, it is anticipated that in future that lot operations interfaces will in principle be able to provide the multi-pass exposure functionality to the lots scheduled.
    Relatively high default RA/SA/WA/LoCo reproduction is a significant noise source for the scanner stability module controller attempting to control the scanner using overlay data from the very limited number of monitor wafers (typically from 4 to 12 wafers per week per scanner). Current scanner stability module implementation achieves control accuracy that is sufficient for matched-machine customer usage, but is insufficient for dedicated chuck usage. For example, 2-3nm scanner stability module control accuracy is small in comparison with matched-machine XT4-1950 overlay of 7nm (5.5nm for NXT) but is very significant compared to the XT4-1950 dedicated-chuck overlay of 3.5nm (2.5nm for NXT). XT and NXT are different implementations of the Twinscan RTM apparatus.
    Control accuracy could be in principle improved by increasing the number of monitor wafers, but, unfortunately, the number of monitor wafers is limited by the availability of the metrology unit, scanner, wafer processing equipment and the customer FAB automation system. Therefore noise reduction on the input of the scanner stability module controller should be reduced, so as to improve the scanner stability module control accuracy while still using the limited number of monitor wafers. This may be achieved, in particular, by averaging out the noise that is generated by the scanner while performing SA/WA/RA/LoCo alignment in the process of exposing the monitor wafers.
    To do this an interface is implemented on the scanner which allows the multiple cycling of each of the monitor wafers through the measure-exposure sequence. This can be done by using a test similar to the FXY test with multi-pass exposures, and/or the above described techniques for “virtual wafer load”-“virtual wafer unload, and/or any other suitable mechanism for providing multi-pass exposure functionality. With such an interface in place, the following method can be performed:
    Use a test similar to the FXY test to perform multi-pass exposures on the scanner stability module monitor wafers;
    Precede each exposure pass by a standard SA/WA/RA/LoCo sequence. Alternatively a non standard sequence may be used. Performing only the recital align and lot correction may suffice. Alternatively or in addition the non-standard sequence may provide increased accuracy, possibly at the cost of throughput. Such methods are disclosed in sister patent application filed the same day under internal reference P-3592.000 (D8062). The methods disclosed therein may be used in conjunction with the methods disclosed herein;
    Reduce the impact of SA/WA/RA/LoCo reproduction by averaging the overlay measurements (obtained using an inspection/metrology tool such as those which use a scatterometer) corresponding to the multiple exposure passes. This may be done in the scanner stability module controller by averaging the SA/WA/RA/LoCo contributions with the aim of separating the calibration offsets that are to be adjusted from the noise;
    If required, perform a one-time calibration (either per scanner of per scanner family) to determine possible systematic overlay offsets (e.g. difference in BAOs) between the default single-pass product-like exposure and the multi-pass exposure.
    Restrict the use of multi-pass exposures to test software and scanner stability module lots (e.g. make multi-pass available only when scanner stability module-specific lot ID is detected in combination with scanner stability module-specific recipe).
    Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of projection lithographic apparatus and scanning functionality, it should be appreciated that the concepts disclosed herein are equally applicable to imprint lithographic apparatus (whereby reference to “exposure” should be considered to be a reference to patterning by imprint lithography and any reference to projection specific apparatus should be considered a reference to the equivalent in imprint lithography as would be known to the skilled person) and/or stepper functionality (whereby any reference to “scanner”, “scanning” or “scanner stability module" should be considered as a reference to the stepper equivalent as would be known to the skilled person.
    Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of lithographic apparatus in the manufacture of ICs, it should be understood that the lithographic apparatus described herein may have other applications, such as the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, flat-panel displays, liquid-crystal displays (LCDs), thin film magnetic heads, etc.. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “wafer” or “die” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general terms “substrate” or “target portion", respectively. The substrate referred to herein may be processed, before or after exposure, in for example a track (a tool that typically applies a layer of resist to a substrate and develops the exposed resist), a metrology tool and/or an inspection tool. Where applicable, the disclosure herein may be applied to such and other substrate processing tools. Further, the substrate may be processed more than once, for example in order to create a multi-layer 1C, so that the term substrate used herein may also refer to a substrate that already contains multiple processed layers.
    The terms “radiation" and “beam” used herein encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation (e.g. having a wavelength of or about 365,355,248,193, 157 or 126 nm) and extreme ultra-violet (EUV) radiation (e.g. having a wavelength in the range of 5-20 nm), as well as particle beams, such as ion beams or electron beams.
    The term “lens”, where the context allows, may refer to any one or combination of various types of optical components, including refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical components.
    While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. For example, the invention, or at least the inventive aspect thereof, may take the form of a computer program containing one or more sequences of machine-readable instructions describing a method as disclosed above, or a data storage medium (e.g. semiconductor memory, magnetic or optical disk) having such a computer program stored therein.
    The descriptions above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Thus, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention as described without departing from the scope of the clauses set out below. Other aspects of the invention are set out as in the following numbered clauses: 1. A lithographic apparatus comprising: a support constructed to support a patterning device; a substrate table constructed to hold a substrate; a patterning system configured to transfer a pattern from said patterning device onto a target portion of the substrate, positioning apparatus operable to position said substrate table, said patterning system and said patterning device relative to each other in a patterning pass comprising a sequence of movements such that said pattern is applied repeatedly at a plurality of target portions of the substrate, and a control module operable to aid control of at least one of said support, substrate table or patterning system by periodically retrieving measurements defining baseline control parameters from one or more reference substrates so as to determine parameter drift from said baseline control parameters thereby enabling allowance and/or correction to be made for said drift, said reference substrate(s) having initially undergone patterning so as to determine said baseline control parameters; wherein said apparatus is operable during said initial patterning of said at least one reference substrate, to perform multiple patterning passes on at least one of said one or more reference substrates.
    2. Apparatus as claimed in clause 1 being further operable to perform an alignment process so as to align at least two of said substrate table, said patterning system and said patterning device relative to each other prior to at least two of said multiple patterning passes.
    3. Apparatus as claimed in clause 2 operable such that a standard alignment model is used for said alignment, said model comprising that known as the “SA/WA/RA/LoCo settings”, wherein SA is stage align for aligning said substrate table, WA is wafer align for aligning said substrate, RA is reticle align for aligning said patterning device and LoCo is lot correction.
    4. Apparatus as claimed in clause 2 operable such that non-standard alignment model settings optimized for accuracy are used for said alignment.
    5. Apparatus as claimed in any preceding clause further comprising an interface between said control module and the other lithographic apparatus, said interface allowing said control module to access multiple patterning pass functionality.
    6. Apparatus as claimed in clause 5 wherein said multiple patterning pass functionality is comprised in a test module for the lithographic apparatus.
    7. Apparatus as claimed in clause 6 operable such that said multiple patterning pass functionality is restricted only to use by the test module or the control module.
    8. Apparatus as claimed in any preceding clause operable such that said multiple patterning pass functionality is achieved by performing a test similar to the “final XY” test wherein a plurality of patterning passes are performed on said substrate such that every target portion undergoes patterning only once.
    9. Apparatus as claimed in any preceding clause operable such that said multiple patterning pass functionality is achieved using “virtual wafer load" and “virtual wafer unload” mechanisms, wherein said substrate is not unloaded at the completion of a patterning pass, but is treated as though it is a newly loaded substrate.
    10. Apparatus as claimed in any preceding clause further comprising an inspection device incorporating a scatterometer for said periodic retrieval of baseline measurements and/or for measuring overlay on said reference substrate(s).
    11. Apparatus as claimed in any preceding clause operable to perform a one-time calibration to determine possible systematic overlay offsets between a default single-pass transfer and a multi-pass transfer.
    12. Apparatus as claimed in any preceding clause operable to perform projection lithography, further comprising: an illumination system configured to condition a radiation beam; a projection system comprised in said patterning system, wherein the patterning device is capable of imparting the radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section to form a patterned radiation beam and said projection system is configured to project the patterned radiation beam onto said target portion of the substrate to perform said patterning.
    13. Apparatus as claimed in clause 12 being operable in at least a scanning mode wherein the patterned radiation beam is scanned across said target portion of the substrate.
    14. A method of producing at least one reference substrate for a lithographic apparatus, said reference substrate being usable in combination with a control module which periodically retrieves measurements from said least one reference substrate which define baseline control parameters, so as to aid scanning control during a lithographic process by determining parameter drift from said baseline control parameters, thereby enabling allowance and/or correction to be made for said drift, said baseline control parameters being determined by initially patterning said at least one reference substrate using said lithographic apparatus, said method comprising performing multiple patterning passes on at least one of said one or more reference substrates, said multiple patterning passes comprising applying a pattern repeatedly at a plurality of target portions of the reference substrate.
    15. Method as claimed in clause 14 wherein an alignment of said substrate and elements of said lithographic apparatus is performed prior to at least two of said multiple patterning passes.
    16. Method as claimed in clause 15 wherein a standard alignment model is used for said alignment, said model comprising that known as the “SA/WA/RA/LoCo settings”, wherein SA is stage align for aligning said substrate table, WA is wafer align for aligning said substate, RA is reticle align for aligning said patterning device and LoCo is lot correction.
    17. Method as claimed in clause 15 wherein non-standard alignment model settings optimized for accuracy are used for said alignment.
    18. Method as claimed in any of clauses 14 to 17 wherein said multiple patterning pass functionality is comprised in functionality normally used in performing test routines on the lithographic apparatus.
    19. Method as claimed in clause 18 wherein said multiple patterning pass functionality is restricted only to use by the test module or the scanning control module.
    20. Method as claimed in any of clauses 14 to 19 wherein said multiple patterning pass functionality is achieved by performing a test similar to the “final XY” test wherein a plurality of patterning passes are performed on said substrate such that every target portion undergoes patterning only once.
    21. Method as claimed in any of clauses 14 to 20 wherein said multiple patterning pass functionality is achieved using “virtual wafer load” and “virtual wafer unload” mechanisms wherein said substrate is not unloaded at the completion of a patterning pass, but is treated as though it is a newly loaded substrate.
    22. Method as claimed in any of clauses 14 to 21 wherein said periodic retrieval of baseline measurements is performed using an inspection device incorporating a scatterometer.
    23. Method as claimed in any of clauses 14 to 22 further including the step of performing a onetime calibration to determine possible systematic overlay offsets between a default single-pass transfer and a multi-pass transfer.
    24. A computer program product comprising a computer program operable to cause a lithography apparatus to carry out the method as claimed in any of clauses 14 to 23.
    权利要求:
    Claims (1)
    [1]
    A lithography device comprising: an exposure device adapted to provide a radiation beam; a carrier constructed to support a patterning device, the patterning device being capable of applying a pattern in a section of the radiation beam to form a patterned radiation beam; a substrate table constructed to support a substrate; and a projection device adapted to project the patterned radiation beam onto a target area of the substrate, characterized in that the substrate table is adapted to position the target area of the substrate in a focal plane of the projection device.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    US20200217648A1|2020-07-09|Inspection Method and Apparatus, Lithographic Apparatus, Lithographic Processing Cell and Device Manufacturing Method
    US8687167B2|2014-04-01|Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method
    US20080135774A1|2008-06-12|Scatterometer, a lithographic apparatus and a focus analysis method
    US7605907B2|2009-10-20|Method of forming a substrate for use in calibrating a metrology tool, calibration substrate and metrology tool calibration method
    JP5266352B2|2013-08-21|Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method
    US7724370B2|2010-05-25|Method of inspection, a method of manufacturing, an inspection apparatus, a substrate, a mask, a lithography apparatus and a lithographic cell
    NL2009853A|2013-06-26|Methods and apparatus for measuring a property of a substrate.
    US8947642B2|2015-02-03|Method and apparatus for estimating model parameters of and controlling a lithographic apparatus by measuring a substrate property and using a polynomial model
    US9134625B2|2015-09-15|Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method for measuring wafer parameters using non-standard alignment settings
    US8947643B2|2015-02-03|Lithographic apparatus and method controlling parameter drift by performing multiple patterning passes on reference substrate
    KR101887924B1|2018-09-06|Inspection method and apparatus, and lithographic apparatus
    WO2010076254A1|2010-07-08|Method of determining a characteristic
    US8972031B2|2015-03-03|Control method and apparatus
    NL2006923A|2012-12-11|Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method.
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    KR20110095831A|2011-08-25|
    TW201142528A|2011-12-01|
    KR101227641B1|2013-01-30|
    CN102163002A|2011-08-24|
    IL210697D0|2011-06-30|
    US20110205520A1|2011-08-25|
    JP2011176309A|2011-09-08|
    JP5443405B2|2014-03-19|
    CN102163002B|2015-02-11|
    US8947643B2|2015-02-03|
    TWI448829B|2014-08-11|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US4492579A|1982-09-02|1985-01-08|Itzhak Shoher|Dental jacket crown, coping and method of construction|
    US6509952B1|2000-05-23|2003-01-21|Silicon Valley Group, Inc.|Method and system for selective linewidth optimization during a lithographic process|
    US20020042664A1|2000-05-31|2002-04-11|Nikon Corporation|Evaluation method, position detection method, exposure method and device manufacturing method, and exposure apparatus|
    DE10037243C2|2000-07-31|2002-06-20|Infineon Technologies Ag|Control system for photolithographic processes|
    JP4905617B2|2001-05-28|2012-03-28|株式会社ニコン|Exposure method and device manufacturing method|
    US6885429B2|2002-06-28|2005-04-26|Asml Holding N.V.|System and method for automated focus measuring of a lithography tool|
    US7791727B2|2004-08-16|2010-09-07|Asml Netherlands B.V.|Method and apparatus for angular-resolved spectroscopic lithography characterization|
    JP2006135015A|2004-11-04|2006-05-25|Canon Inc|Exposure device|
    JP2006190794A|2005-01-06|2006-07-20|Nikon Corp|Adjusting method, exposure method, and exposure device|
    TWI281115B|2005-01-25|2007-05-11|Promos Technologies Inc|Integration system for managing photolithography tools and the method for operating the same|
    US7375799B2|2005-02-25|2008-05-20|Asml Netherlands B.V.|Lithographic apparatus|
    TWI352878B|2005-06-13|2011-11-21|Asml Netherlands Bv|Lithographic device, and method|
    US7649614B2|2005-06-10|2010-01-19|Asml Netherlands B.V.|Method of characterization, method of characterizing a process operation, and device manufacturing method|
    JP5257832B2|2007-12-28|2013-08-07|株式会社ニコン|Calibration method, moving body driving method and moving body driving apparatus, exposure method and exposure apparatus, pattern forming method and pattern forming apparatus, and device manufacturing method|
    JP2009231564A|2008-03-24|2009-10-08|Toshiba Corp|Method of correcting scan exposure equipment|
    NL2005996A|2010-02-19|2011-08-22|Asml Netherlands Bv|Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method.|
    IL210832A|2010-02-19|2016-11-30|Asml Netherlands Bv|Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method|US8629407B2|2011-04-13|2014-01-14|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.|Contamination inspection|
    NL2011683A|2012-12-13|2014-06-16|Asml Netherlands Bv|Method of calibrating a lithographic apparatus, device manufacturing method and associated data processing apparatus and computer program product.|
    US10908512B2|2015-12-24|2021-02-02|Asml Netherlands B.V.|Methods of controlling a patterning process, device manufacturing method, control system for a lithographic apparatus and lithographic apparatus|
    US9966315B2|2016-07-05|2018-05-08|Globalfoundries Inc.|Advanced process control methods for process-aware dimension targeting|
    EP3396458A1|2017-04-28|2018-10-31|ASML Netherlands B.V.|Method and apparatus for optimization of lithographic process|
    法律状态:
    2012-01-25| WDAP| Patent application withdrawn|Effective date: 20110829 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    US30605210P| true| 2010-02-19|2010-02-19|
    US30605210|2010-02-19|
    [返回顶部]